Hi Dan, 100k is probably ok to rsync, IMO. Jeff C. __
On Thursday, May 6, 2004, 3:16:55 PM, Smart,Dan Smart,Dan wrote: > So I assume a site under 250,000/day should just use the public name > servers? Would you discourage a 100,000/day site from rsyncing? > <<Dan>> > | -----Original Message----- > | From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > | Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 12:49 AM > | Anyone running a high-volume mail system (i.e., more than > | 250,000 inbound messages per day) is strongly encouraged to > | set up local caching of their RBL zone files including > | SURBLs. The benefits are improved mail performance, reduced > | network traffic, and offloading of the public nameservers. > | rbldnsd and rsync is the preferred way to do it, but BIND > | will also work (slower ;-).
