Robert Menschel wrote:
> My corpus check this last weekend shows #counts RATWR7a_MESSID > 11589s/2008h of 115925 corpus (94616s/21309h) 05/01/04 and suggests a > score of 0.278. The 4/30/04 version I use has an even more > conservative internal score of 0.252. What version are you using?
The header reads as follows:
# SARE file # (05/07/04) # For notes, updates, licensing, and info see: # www.rulesemporeum.com
BTW, shouldn't that be "www.rulesemporium.com" (note the spelling)? As for Thunderbird, I'm using V0.6 now, but I noticed the ratware ID matches with TB 0.5. I don't think the ID is generated differently in these two Thunderbird versions, though.
If I might add a suggestion: the release date information can be a tad confusing for non-Americans. How about using 2004-05-07 instead (as defined in ISO 8601)? Thanks.
> I don't think it's fair to claim that any single rule with a score > under 0.3 "has a problem", since you'd need more than 16 such rules > to score a false positive.
I never claimed it was a problem, my mail was not filtered anyway. ;-) I just wanted to let you know that there was some ID rule which got triggered by Mozilla Thunderbird. As TB uses a very simple ID pattern, this doesn't surprise me too much, and I'll keep on using ratware.cf.
-- Mit freundlichen Gr��en / Yours sincerely Dipl. Inform. Ralph Seichter
HORUS-IT Ahornweg 10 D-57635 Oberirsen Tel +49 2686 987880 Fax +49 2686 987889 http://horus-it.de/
