>I've got about 1000 spam messages saved up, and was wondering if it >would have an adverse affect on Bayes if I fed these to it, without >feeding any ham? > >I currently have autolearn on, and it's doing pretty good, but I'd like
>to get it better. > >Thanks, >Max > > >It won't hurt it much, but 50/50 should be the optimum goal. >--Chris Thanks for the reply. But am I better off not feeding it that spam and waiting until I can collect an equal amount of ham? Right now, as I said, it's doing a pretty good job with autolearn. You say it won't hurt much, do you mean it may increase undetected spam? Thanks, Max
