Hello Scott, Monday, May 24, 2004, 2:00:49 PM, you wrote:
SD> What I would like to see happen is for the messages that are tagged SD> as spam to be rejected back to the original sender similar to the way SD> postfix does when checking header and body content. If you can figure out how to bounce these back to the original *sender* rather than the other hapless victim whose email address is in the From or Reply-To header, then more power to you. If you can't figure that out, then DO NOT bounce spam. All you'll do is share your problem with that other victim, and the spammer will get twice his money's worth for that one spam. SD> An acceptable alternative would be to have all mail that is tagged as SD> spam forwarded to another (maybe spamtrap for example) that holds SD> messages for a certain time period (perhaps 7 days) then deletes them. I drop ALL spam from three domains into my spamtrap to feed Bayes and my corpus. My method probably wouldn't work for you, since my setup is (pick one: crazy, strange, weird), but yes, it should be feasible. How is SA called, and can you put another program into the stream which will redirect spam to your spamtrap? Bob Menschel
