Is the "Habeas warrant mark" even useful anymore? From my end it
appears in more spam than ham.
- Mike
Content analysis details: (10.1 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
4.0 CSL_X_MESSAGE_INFO X-Message-Info header found
0.3 SARE_WEOFFER BODY: Offers Something
5.4 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
0.3 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
-8.0 HABEAS_SWE Has Habeas warrant mark (http://www.habeas.com/)
1.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS
[12.218.13.72 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
0.7 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org
[<http://dsbl.org/listing?ip=12.218.13.72>]
1.5 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?12.218.13.72>]
2.6 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address
[12.218.13.72 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts
1.2 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag
