Hello Sean, Friday, May 28, 2004, 11:35:47 AM, you wrote:
SS> Was I the only one to misunderstand that you HAVE to use SS> 70_sare_html0.cf if you want to use 70_sare_html1.cf? No, you weren't the only one. One of the SARE ninjas missed that also, attempting a mass-check on html1 only without html0. I tried to be clear about the dependency, but apparently failed. I'm adding the __subtests to each of the 70_sare_html?.cf files. They'll be there by tomorrow. Question though: Given that 70_sare_html0.cf rules hit ONLY spam, and hit significant spam, while 70_sare_html1.cf rules either hit less spam or hit both spam and ham, why would you use file 1 and not file 0? Bob Menschel
