Anyone else been getting the below failure lately? This is the first time I've seen it in sending a message to this list...
-Joe K. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 2:38 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: failure notice > > > Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mailer.cwie.net. > I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the > following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given > up. Sorry it didn't work out. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 64.38.194.22 does not like recipient. > Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Giving up on 64.38.194.22. > > --- Below this line is a copy of the message. > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: (qmail 9769 invoked by uid 510); 3 Jun 2004 19:38:04 -0000 > Received: from unknown (HELO > CCBill-Exchange.exchange.cwie.net) (64.38.194.13) > by mailer.cwie.net with SMTP; 3 Jun 2004 19:38:04 -0000 > Received: from corpmail.cwie.net ([63.214.164.17]) by > CCBill-Exchange.exchange.cwie.net with Microsoft > SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 3 Jun 2004 12:38:02 -0700 > Received: (qmail 411 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jun 2004 19:38:02 -0000 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message > Subject: RE: [sort of OT] Sendmail and RBLs > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 > Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 12:38:03 -0700 > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ge.cwie.net> > X-MS-Has-Attach: > X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: > Thread-Topic: [sort of OT] Sendmail and RBLs > thread-index: AcRJokkjZL11kxm9Teu0MUFA93kJkw== > List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > List-Unsubscribe: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Kang , Joseph S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John Fawcett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 1:53 PM > > To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) > > Subject: Re: [sort of OT] Sendmail and RBLs > >=20 > >=20 > > From: "Chris Santerre" > > > Well there is no Sendmail list that I know of, so you guys are > > > the=20 next > > best > > > source. I just realized today that sendmail is checking=20 > > RBLs _BEFORE_=20 > > > checking to see if the user is legit. OUCH! > > > > > > Seems like quite a waste of time. Is this because of > delay_checks=20 > > > being enabled? > > > > > > IF this is in the Oreily book, I'm sorry for asking. I've only > > > read=20 1/4 of it, and well, SARE started :) Kind of took up my=20 > > reading time. > > > > > Chris, delay_checks on or off doesn't matter. I used RBLs in > SENDMAIL = with delay_checks off. > > I think it's working as designed. If the message is in an > RBL drop it. = No point in seeing if it's for a valid user > or not. I mean, that's the = point of the RBL. Save a step > before attempting delivery. Non? > > -Joe K >
