Hello Matthias, Saturday, June 5, 2004, 2:36:55 AM, you wrote:
>>Now to see if I can enhance the rule(s -- there are others also) to catch >>these before the spammers take action on your samples. :-) MK> I started making my own rules as I found the first spam with a 1px font MK> that wasn't caught by the two already present rules MK> My rule to catch those stuff bases on the idea that I dont try to catch MK> the complete font-size but just as far as I can be sure it HAS to be a MK> tinyfont... Pretty much the same line of thought I had when refining the tinyfont rules in the html rule sets last month. MK> I'm very sorry that I didn't see up to right now that sare_coding has MK> been moved to sare_html and I've not yet tested those so there might MK> be a couple of double rules but I'm sure we can sort that out..... Jesse points out that most of your examples are caught by his contributions found in various sare_html rules, but I think you may have a few examples his didn't cover. MK> So Bob, I believe you have the possibility to do some masschecking over MK> all my rules (I've got a lot of other CSS and especially HTML tag rules MK> very often seen in spammails) as I'd like to know if they can hit some MK> hams which most of those did not do on my system.... Yes, if you'll send me a copy of those rules in an attached file, I'll gladly run them against my mass-check, in conjunction with the sare_html set. I can then not only see how well yours perform, but analyze the overlap with what we already have. MK> Then I could send you my rules and if they prove to be successful, plese MK> be free to include them in sare_html That would be great. Thanks. Bob Menschel
