Justin Mason said: > Actually, this one's not much use either -- the author didn't use > SpamAssassin's Bayes for some reason, but compared it against several > hand-trained Bayesian filters. Not good methodology ;) It will be an unusual comparsion of bayes systems in a few months when 3.0 comes out and people write plugins for crm114/DSPAM/bogofilter and then they can can included in spamassassin.
err: Spamassassin now uses all bayesian filters known to man. They've also added support for the temporal predictor plugin, which detects the spam before it is sent. -- Luke Computer Science System Administrator Security Administrator,College of Engineering Montana State University-Bozeman,Montana
