----- Original Message ----- From: "Chuck Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sure, check-out www.surbl.org for lots of info about surbl/uribl. If you > > > are using any of the custom URI rulesets, then switching to the DNS based > > > URI tests instead should provide a nice performance increase. > > > > High load sites should not enable redirector support in surbl. > > What is high load? I get about 5000 to 6000 emails a day where I'm planning > on implementing this. Currently I have a ratio (using SA) of about > 2:1 ham to spam, specifically because of the high volume mailing lists. > > w/o mailing lists the ratio is more like 100:1 spam:ham > > I'm looking to sort this out for a group of about 30 email users. We receives about 200,000 e-mail messages per day, split between two mail gateways, and have had no resource issues with using the additional redirect options with spamcop_uri. You can find info on how to setup and support the redirect options in the "rules/spamcop_uri.cf" file of the spamcopuri tarball. Monitor your server processor utilization and if it start getting high, you can always disable the redirect support later. Bill
