> > Main question is, from peoples experience how stable is 3.0 > CVS likely to be on a production machine - I appreciate it's > something of a piece of string question, I guess not having > played with CVS snapshots before I'm a little wary of how > they are likely to be stability-wise compared to the final release.. >
I've been running 3.0 SVN on a spamd cluster that does 500k msg/day for over a month now... Since r19xxx something.. Cant remember for sure, it was whenever it moved to preforking spamd. The only thing that I really had to change was the way subject rewriting works.. Its now rewrite_header Subject *****SPAM***** instead of subject_tag *****SPAM***** and rewrite_subject 1 Oh, and I had to remove the -a flag from my spamd/run script, because it will fail to start if you leave it in there. Dallas
