Hi, On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Michele Neylon wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 23:08, Mariano Absatz wrote: > > I've once come across a rule that hit the word 'cum' but did not check > > for boundaries, so 'document' would hit... > > That depends on how you write your rules.... > > Looking at some of the more advanced ones makes my head hurt :) So why not tune a Bayesian analyzer to identify smut? Then you're less likely to get bitten by The Scunthorpe Effect... -- Bob
