Frank Joerdens wrote:
Greetings! We get a number of messages at our site that SA (version 2.60) doesn't even score. The X-Spam-Level: etc. stuff that SA adds to the header is missing entirely.
Now I think I've identified the common denominator to all those mails that slip through: They all have mailbodies that are base64 encoded.
Does that ring a bell with anyone? Any ideas?
Cheers, Frank
yes i see more and more of them slipping through.
i already fed more than 50 of those manually to bayes but they still get through.
hell i don't even know whats inside of that crap since all non-outlook mua's i know can't read winmail.dat anyway.
all use that silly M$ winmail.dat attachment format.
------=_NextPart_000_00B6_01C4537D.6FBAD870 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="winmail.dat"
i'm thinking about a rule to add some base points for this crap. but i fear to hit too much FP. :S
what are you guys thinking?
how much points should a base64 encoded winmail.dat be worth?
