Try blacklist-uri from Rules Emporium. Your message hit on 2 of the rules from that rule set.
Brian On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 09:46, Scott Blomquist wrote: > Alright, I've had it with these folks. I've been getting MANY of these > for the last week and nothing is catching them. I've been feeding to > Bayes, hence the Bayes_90 score but; they're still getting through. > Is there a ruleset that catches these? > ps I know I need to upgrade, I'm waiting for 3.0 so I don't have to go > through it all twice. > thanks for any help, > Scott > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: from 216.114.128.66 ([222.108.11.77]) > by babyblue-eth1.parkstpress.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id > i5JCZT530772; > Sat, 19 Jun 2004 08:35:30 -0400 > X-Message-Info: J02eNSl74rxw64VZ36+ucgJG440TZe > Received: from mail8787.cdws.pobox.sk ([6.36.228.254]) by > hxr4-o600.pobox.sk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); > Sat, 19 Jun 2004 17:38:33 +0400 > Received: from J940 (ow226.12.235.134.yj003.iq.pobox.sk [128.10.187.248]) > by mail072.hmg.pobox.sk (2.5.809sf874/3.407.91) with SMTP id > crs344HK209Se4751; > Sat, 19 Jun 2004 16:37:33 +0300 > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Herschel " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: checkerboard > Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 16:41:33 +0300 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="--4961150885349268" > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=5.0 > tests=BAYES_90,J_CHICKENPOX_23 > version=2.53 > X-Spam-Level: *** > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) > > Aron Lang,\ > > Save Up-to 70% On Your Term +Life+Coverage,? > > Compare Your Current_Coverage ,( > > Get Your F_R_E E QU0TES - SMOKER Rates Available > Don't Wait To StartSaving Today! > > > http://c9003hosting.com > > > Att: dontwantany.. > http://yahoo.com-yahoo.com.ph/click.php?id=leneyex > > ,ague ,awl > ,biochemic ,chastise . >
