Thanks, Matt. As I suspected. I did try the changes to local.cf as suggested by the two Ryans, but alas...
Yes, 2.55 is old and I'll upgrade this week, but I've given up on the detailed scoring. For now I'll just run spamc against a saved message from my inbox to see the breakdown. Thanks! > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 12:59 PM > To: James McGowan; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Detailed scoring in headers -- Where did it go? > > At 02:15 PM 6/18/2004, James McGowan wrote: > >I'm running SA 2.55 on a Linux box with QMail. Before upgrading to SA > >2.55, we were using 2.20. The X headers in 2.20 used to include a > >multi-line breakdown of the rules that were hit, which I found very > >useful. Under 2.55, there's only the X-Spam-Status flag and the total > >score. Was the change made to simply reduce the amount of stuff in the > >headers? Is there a way I can get the verbose scoring back? > > > >I tried by turning off use_terse_report in local.cf, but it didn't help. > >Is this because I call SA from qmail-scanner? > > Yes, it is because you call SA from qmail-scanner.. ALL message markups > under qmail-scanner are done by qmail-scanner and any markups done by SA > are IGNORED. You'll want to look at the config files for qmail-scanner to > change this. > > I'd also suggest ignoring the multiple replies that suggest you use the > report template commands. Those commands only work in 2.6x or higher, and > you explicitly stated you're using 2.55.. (And of course, because you use > qmail-scanner, the report formats generated by SA are irrelevant anyway). > > Of course, this does beg the question of why you're using a heavily > outdated version of SA, but that's your business (as long as you're aware > your version is pretty old) > > > > > > __________________________________________________________ > This message was scanned by GatewayDefender > 3:58:31 PM ET - 6/18/2004
