On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:21:09PM -0400, Ryan Moore wrote:
I guess what I'm wondering is that is SA not able/designed to recognize UUencoded attachments? If not, then I guess I should modify the
As an FYI: that's not a uuencoded _attachment_. "attachment" implies a MIME part (and if you're doing mime, you'd use base64...) it's an uuencoded inline file.
SA doesn't do anything special with inline uuencoded parts, it just treats it as message text. SA appropriately disregards binary MIME parts though.
For more information, Bugzilla 3278 covered this a bit: http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3278
Yea I just called it an attachment since Mozilla recognized it as an attachment for me, I'm not sure how it is treated officially speaking. I'll go ahead and modify the rulesets I have here though so they alone can't trip a message, Thanks.
Ryan Moore ---------- Perigee.net Corporation 704-849-8355 (sales) 704-849-8017 (tech) www.perigee.net
