>-----Original Message----- >From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 8:35 AM >To: SpamAssassin >Subject: Re: OT: Re: List blocked in SPEWS [SCANNED] > > >On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, 5:21:08 AM, David Thurman wrote: >> On 6/29/04 9:53 PM, "Bob Apthorpe" wrote: > >>> Q: Why >>> aren't the Yahoo stock listing pages listed in the SURBL >(anymore?) How >>> does one tell the spammer domains from innocents? Be careful when >>> bringing up consistent application of principles... ;-) > >> Thanks for clarifying this, on another list a few boohooed >the SpamCop_URI >> plug-in claiming that SURBL would blacklist innocent parties. > >We try not to list innocent parties for example by making >fairly stringent requirements for getting listed (far >more stringent than bl.spamcop.net, for example). If >we find out about any false positives, we whitelist them >immediately also. >
Hey Dave! We take FPs very seriously. You don't want to know what happens to people who add FPs! I still can't sit down! ;) --Chris
