On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 16:09, Jeff Chan wrote: > On Thursday, July 1, 2004, 6:32:12 AM, David Thurman wrote: > > On 7/1/04 8:19 AM, "jdow" wrote: > > >> OK, what if a spam company trades publicly? > > > Get them delisted ;) > > Seriously, yes. The more public a company is, the more they have > to lose by breaking the law. Therefore public companies will > tend not to be spammers. It's no guarantee of course, but > perhaps an increased probability. >
This is why you read about sub-sub-sub-contracting for this stuff. It give the public company the "plausible deny-ability" card. -------------------------------------------------------- A man can have two, maybe three love affairs while he's married. After that it's cheating. -- Yves Montand --------------------------------------------------------
