On Saturday 03 July 2004 11:13, Scot L. Harris wrote: > I have seen a couple of messages recently indicating that the bayes > database becomes less effective over time. Is this really true? > > I thought the idea was that by feeding spam and ham sets to it on a > regular basis that is should continue to become more effective. > > So how often should the entire database be purged? > > Are there issues with the ratio of ham spam in the database being to far > out of equilibrium?
IMHO, it is not less effective AS LONG AS you feed missed spam and False Positives back to SA-Learn process. -- _____________________________________ John Andersen
pgp78UcUA6wbB.pgp
Description: signature
