Despite the documentation, I recommend NOT using the trailing dot notation. In my experience it doesn't seem to work correctly and causes problems.
Try revising all the entries like this one:
trusted_networks 131.111.
to CIDR notation
trusted_networks 131.111.0.0/16Otherwise, try running the message through spamassassin -D and see which hosts it declares trusted.
At 09:33 AM 7/8/2004, Tony Finch wrote:
I'm using SA 2.63 invoked via MailScanner. I have the following in my local.cf (we have quite a few networks):
clear_trusted_networks trusted_networks 131.111. trusted_networks 129.169. trusted_networks 128.232. trusted_networks 192.18.195. trusted_networks 192.84.5. trusted_networks 192.153.213. trusted_networks 193.60.80/20 trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8 trusted_networks 172.16.0.0/12 trusted_networks 192.168.0.0/16
But I get messages like the following:
Received: from mta09-svc.ntlworld.com ([62.253.162.49]:23877) by ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (mx.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.145]:25) with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BiFNc-0004ug-V2; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 17:34:45 +0100 Received: from martinprince ([81.96.65.160]) by mta09-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 16:36:59 +0100 X-Cam-SpamDetails: scanned, SpamAssassin (score=4.121, MAILTO_CRSID -0.38, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR 1.05, MIME_MISSING_BOUNDARY 0.80, RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK 2.55, RCVD_IN_SORBS 0.10)
None of the problems described in the wiki apply. http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DynablockIssues
Have I configured it wrong?
Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ LOUGH FOYLE TO CARLINGFORD LOUGH: NORTHEAST 3 OR 4 OCCASIONALLY 5, BACKING NORTHWEST AND GRADUALLY DECREASING 3 OR 4. RISK OF SHOWERS. MAINLY GOOD. SLIGHT TO MODERATE DECAYING SLIGHT.
