>-----Original Message----- >From: Chr. von Stuckrad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 9:27 AM >To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) >Subject: Re: [RD] BIGEVIL the big one, just went live! > > >On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 03:56:07PM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote: >> going to guess and say over 35K. Which isn't a lot compared >to the other >> lists. But surprisingly stats show that WS hits more then >the bigger lists! >> >> Quality over quantity. Or maybe just freshness. >> >> Whatever it is, it works like a charm ;) > >Well, after changing to the new *big* one, my spamd jumped >from near 20M to above 50M Memory per Child! >Next Morning the Host was near death of thrashing ... > >Is *such* a large increase 'correct'? >Or do I have to seach for other trouble than *BIG*_evil? > >Stucki
No that is correct. Bigevil got 10x bigger. I am worried abuot larger systems being able to handle it. I'm suggesting people use surbl.org if they can. It is much faster, better, more inclusive, sexy, and smells like strawberries. I've got some ideas to get Bigevil down in size, but nothing that will make a huge dent. surbl.org is the way to go. If you can't do net tests, rsync it and do it locally. --Chris
