On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Kelson Vibber wrote:
> From: Kelson Vibber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 16:52:43 -0700
> Subject: Re: Anyone have rules for this?
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-65.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,UPPERCASE_25_50,
> USER_IN_WHITELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO autolearn=no version=2.60
>
> At 04:29 PM 7/9/2004, Jon Trulson wrote:
> >On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Evan Platt wrote:
> > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-54.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAD_CREDIT,BAYES_10,
> > > FAKE_HELO_YAHOO,RCVD_IN_SORBS,USER_IN_WHITELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO
> > > autolearn=no version=2.60
> >
> > Use Bayes... Haven't been seeing these in my inbox for a few weeks
> >now.
>
> Huh? He *is* using Bayes - it's right there, BAYES_10. And there's no way
But apparently not trained well enough. As I said, I get BAYES_99
on these now.
> that training Bayes to get BAYES_99 on this can counteract
> USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO.
This is true, however, I did not see USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO in the
OP's original email... rather, I see:
... tests=SUBJ_DOLLARS,BAD_CREDIT,BAYES_20,NO_RDNS2 version=2.61
So... ?
--
Jon Trulson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ID: 1A9A2B09, FP: C23F328A721264E7 B6188192EC733962
PGP keys at http://radscan.com/~jon/PGPKeys.txt
#include <std/disclaimer.h>
"I am Nomad." -Nomad
