On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Dan Kohn wrote: > http://plg.uwaterloo.ca/~gvcormac/spamcormack1.pdf
Thank you very much. This paper also points out that SpamAssassin in auto-learn mode (i.e. without any manual training) is significantly better with both false-positives and false-negatives than SpamAssassin without Bayes. This is important for sites like mine where the installation is centralized and there is no sensible way of getting training data. I'm currently running without Bayes for this reason, and because of vague FUD, and probably also hardware performance limitations. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ FORTIES CROMARTY FORTH: WESTERLY OR SOUTHWESTERLY, BECOMING VARIABLE IN NORTH FOR A TIME, 3 OR 4. SHOWERS IN NORTH. GOOD.
