Unfortunately, it's not working for me. Here's the result of the test:
Content analysis details: (1001.4 points, 7.5 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
1000 GTUBE BODY: Generic Test for Unsolicited Bulk Email
1.4 DNS_FROM_RFCI_DSN RBL: From: sender listed in
dsn.rfc-ignorant.org
And BigEvil is working for me as these are the results from a real spam:
Content analysis details: (16.9 points, 7.5 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
6.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
0.3 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
0.1 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
3.0 BigEvilList_634 URI: Generated BigEvilList_634
Right now, SA 2.63 is pretty effective for me, around 99% with no false
positives but with the volume going up, it doesn't hurt to have SURBL
active since it looks like BigEvil is going away...
Thanks.
--Henry Kwan
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
> I'm not really saying anything other then it will work. I'm not sure why
> that is failing there, but I *think* it has something to do with that line.
> I'm hoping Eric will see this.
>
> The other error you posted is an error with Bigvil.cf ?????
> (Which reminds me..time to go update that...)
>
> --Chris
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 2:14 PM
> >To: Chris Santerre
> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SURBL Discussion list
> >(E-mail)
> >Subject: RE: SURBL Help?
> >
> >
> >
> >Oops. Maybe I misread your email. Are you saying that I shouldn't be
> >"http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com/foo/bar"; as a test
> >URL? If so,
> >which one should I use?
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >--Henry Kwan
> >
> >On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
> >
> >> It will work. I'm not sure why everyone is getting these.
> >I've looked at the
> >> code in there and the only thing that stands out is that all
> >of those lines
> >> contain
> >>
> >> "http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com/foo/bar";
> >>
> >> So there may lie the problem?
> >>
> >> --Chris
> >>
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 1:14 PM
> >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >Subject: SURBL Help?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Hi. Did anyone run into a open_redirect problem when
> >> >installing the SURBL
> >> >plugin? (See error log below)
> >> >
> >> >And if I try to install it anyway by copying over the .cf
> >> >file, SA spits out
> >> >this error when testing:
> >> >
> >> >debug: uri tests: Done uriRE
> >> >Failed to compile URI SpamAssassin tests, skipping:
> >> >(syntax error at /etc/mail/spamassassin/spamcop_uri.cf, rule
> >> >SPAMCOP_URI_RBL, line 1, near "eval:"
> >> >syntax error at /etc/mail/spamassassin/bigevil.cf, rule
> >> >BigEvilList_23, line
> >> >1038, near ";
> >> >}"
> >> >
> >> >I'm running Fedora C1 with SA 2.63 and all the prerequisite
> >> >perl modules.
> >> >
> >> >Thanks.
> >> >
> >> >---snip---
> >> >(home/spam) mail 2%> perl Makefile.PL
> >> >Checking if your kit is complete...
> >> >Looks good
> >> >Writing Makefile for Mail::SpamAssassin::SpamCopURI
> >> >(home/spam) mail 3%> make
> >> >cp lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm blib/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm
> >> >cp lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm
> >> >blib/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm
> >> >cp lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/SpamCopURI.pm
> >> >blib/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/SpamCopURI.pm
> >> >Manifying blib/man3/Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus.3pm
> >> >Manifying blib/man3/Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf.3pm
> >> >Manifying blib/man3/Mail::SpamAssassin::SpamCopURI.3pm
> >> >(home/spam) mail 4%> make test
> >> >PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e"
> >> >"test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
> >> >t/blacklist........ok
> >> >t/dnsrbl...........ok
> >> >t/extract_urls.....ok
> >> >t/mailto...........ok
> >> >t/open_redirect....NOK 1# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at
> >line 37)
> >> >t/open_redirect....NOK 2# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at
> >line 44)
> >> >t/open_redirect....NOK 3# Failed test (t/open_redirect.t at
> >line 52)
> >> >t/open_redirect....ok 4/5# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 5.
> >> >t/open_redirect....dubious
> >> >Test returned status 3 (wstat 768, 0x300)
> >> >Scalar found where operator expected at (eval 152) line 1,
> >near "'int'
> >> >$__val"
> >> >(Missing operator before $__val?)
> >> >DIED. FAILED tests 1-3
> >> >Failed 3/5 tests, 40.00% okay
> >> >t/spamcopuri.......ok
> >> >t/whitelist........ok
> >> >Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
> >> >---------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >----------------
> >> >t/open_redirect.t 3 768 5 3 60.00% 1-3
> >> >Failed 1/7 test scripts, 85.71% okay. 3/57 subtests failed,
> >> >94.74% okay.
> >> >make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
> >> >(home/spam) mail 5%>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
