On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 04:53:02PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:manually killing the spamd process leaves behind 5 child processes, and
stopping postfix does not stop spamd as it did.
By "manually killing" do you mean "kill -9"? If so, yeah, that'll happen.
I just did a kill <pid> not a -9
What is the correct method to stop and start SA 3.0 (3.0.0-r20550)?
Just sending an INT or TERM will work. :)
BTW: 20550 is a bit out of date. I'd upgrade at least to pre2 (22000-something), if not just grabbing SVN head.
I did upgrade just after posting. I'd staed away from pre1 because I was told there were some problems, but pre2 has been fine.
I wish spamd would take a HUP
--
At 20:43 the dome of St. Elvis Cathedral shattered... and the Devil walked the earth again. He'd never really left.
