On Monday, July 19, 2004, 5:23:46 PM, Joseph Burford wrote: > For every 1000 spam hits on SC/WS/OB.surbl.org DS only gets 100.
> I haven't yet seen a real world spam hit in DS that wasn't in one of the > other lists. > Over the last few weeks I have had it in our systems it's running > between 4 and 5 percent FP. > Personally I'm inclined to think it is a waste of resources. The dynamic > data on SC, and the ability to submit to WS make those lists a lot more > attractive and worthwhile. Yikes! I'd say 4 to 5 percent FPs is unworkable for a SURBL.... Anyone else have results of testing ds.surbl.org to share? Jeff C.
