On Monday, July 19, 2004, 10:27:52 PM, Graham Murray wrote: > "Geoff Soper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Can anyone think why a message from a private individual would ever >> contain '<img="http://' ? > Yes, if they want to show you (and probably other people) > photograph(s). It would probably be easier (for someone who know what > they are doing) to upload the photographs to a web site and embed the > links in the email than to attach the photographs to each individual > email. It would certainly be smarter than using attachments to ship photos around by email. Alas too few people do it. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
