From: "Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I've had a couple of these squeak by. Is there any rule out there to give
> it an additional push to get tagged? I've been manually learning these as
> they come in, but not sure if its doing any good.
>
> Status: R
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from S010600300402933e.cg.shawcable.net ([68.147.181.139])
> by merlin (EarthLink SMTP Server) with SMTP id 1bQUGc46s3NZFlq0
> Sat, 31 Jul 2004 07:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: (qmail 37033 invoked by uid 82); Sat, 31 Jul 2004 13:12:44 -0200
> Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 12:17:44 -0300
> From: Amie Goodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Invitation
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MIME-version: 1.0
> Content-type: text/plain;
> charset=us-ascii;
> format=flowed
> Content-transfer-encoding: 7Bit
> X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6)
> Gecko/20040113
> X-ELNK-AV: 0
> X-Spam-DCC: : cpollock 1074; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on cpollock
> X-Spam-Level: ****
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,
> RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.63
> X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
> X-Status: N
Um, run it through Bayes to bring the Bayes score on it and similar
messages a little.
{^_^}
