Hi there. While upgrading to SA 2.64, I decided to take advantage of the newer versions of Mail::SpamAssassin::SpamCopURI which allow the use of bitmasked SURBLs. I figured this might provide a slight performance increase due to caching of SURBL lookups, so I created a new .cf file using the new syntax (see attached).
I did a little testing with my caught spam folder, and I noticed something odd--there seems to be a disparity between what's in multi.surbl.org and in some of the individual lists (sc.surbl.org, ws.surbl.org, etc.) Is the multi.surbl.org synchronised dynamically to the individual lists, or is there some lag? For now I've switched back to using the individual lists, but I'm wondering if there's an explanation? ---- Nels Lindquist <*> Information Systems Manager Morningstar Air Express Inc.
The following section of this message contains a file attachment
prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.
If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any other MIME-compliant system,
you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer.
If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance.
---- File information -----------
File: surbl.cf
Date: 5 Aug 2004, 14:09
Size: 1739 bytes.
Type: Unknown
surbl.cf
Description: Binary data
