-> -----Original Message----- -> From: Peter Bowyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 9:48 AM -> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> Subject: RE: Why is ATT.net comimg up as spam due to numeric -> helo? And whyis there no report attachment? -> -> -> Mike Burger said: -> > -> > Well, I can only really answer the first...yes...ATT.net's admins -> > screwed up, somehow, and need to fix the server in -> question. The DNS -> > for the server in question is just fine, but the system, itself, -> > should be HELO'ing with a name, not an IP. -> -> To be clear, that's not an RFC-type SHOULD - an IP literal -> is completely valid in a HELO (that's an IP address in []) -> provided it's an IP which belongs to the server in question -> - but it's definitely a 'look less spammy' SHOULD. -> -> Peter ->
OK Not wanting to start a RFC war!!!! Why is SA nailing the email on the numeric IP is this a ATT.net problem or is this a problem is with in my domain of control? I am having ALL @att.net email end up in my shared "not-spam" folder so this is a system wide problem for me. I have just white_listed [EMAIL PROTECTED] but this is not a solution in my mind really. All I need now is a nice porn spammer to hit me from att.net to light a fire here.
