Bit of an oddity that this got tagged as spam, obviously the XBL test pushed it way over the threshold...
Daz -----Original Message----- From: Justin Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 August 2004 07:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: *****SPAM***** SpamAssassin 3.0.0-rc1 RELEASE CANDIDATE available! The JPC Spam Filter believes this email to be spam. The original message has been attached to this report, and the subject line altered so you can recognise and block similar unwanted email in future. Content preview: *** THIS IS A RELEASE CANDIDATE ONLY, NOT THE FINAL 3.0.0 RELEASE *** SpamAssassin 3.0.0-rc1 is released! SpamAssassin 3.0.0 is a major update and includes a number of new email and anti-spam technologies. [...] Content analysis details: (8.6 points, 5.0 required) -0.0 BAYES_44 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 44 to 50% [score: 0.4565] 3.7 FVGT_u_BZ_TLD URI: FVGT - Contains a URL in the BZ or TC top-level domain 4.9 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL [209.237.227.199 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
