Bugs item #961019, was opened at 2004-05-27 06:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by anadelonbrin You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Outlook >Group: 1.0.4 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 4 Submitted By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Assigned to: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Summary: Outlook2K3 spews warnings as it fails to create spam field Initial Comment: New Inbox messages get a spam rating of 100% but are not moved to "__Spam" folder as expected Key symptom from log (attached) seems to be "Eeek - only expecting one row from IPC.MS.REN.USERFIELDS" and then "WARNING: We just created the user field in folder Mailbox - Andy Neil/IPM_SUBTREE/Inbox, but it appears to not exist. Something is probably wrong with DoesFolderHaveOutlookField()" Config details: WinXPSP1, user account has local administrator privileges. Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5703) (with full Office 2003 Pro install). NewsGator 2.0. All Outlook rules have been turned off. Outlook "Junk E-mail Filtering" set to "No automatic filtering". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 21:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe (duplicate messages) in: [ 1345248 ] identified spam is duplicated in spam folder http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1345248&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2005-12-05 21:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting dupe (no effect) in: [ 1000192 ] Weird Userfield errors in log every day http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1000192&group_id=61702&atid=498103 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-11-03 17:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See also: [ 1000192 ] Weird Userfield errors in log every day <https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1000192&group_id=61702&atid=498103> Where there are the errors, but apparently no symptoms! Odd.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-27 11:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 See also: [ 956834 ] Outlook crashes when accessing SpamBayes functions <http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=61702&atid=498103&func=detail&aid=956834> I suspect that these are duplicates, but although they both have the "only expecting one row" problem, the other problems seem qutie different. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-12 19:41 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Note that Richard has done this: the new tracker is: [ 988624 ] More of Bug no 961019 <https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=988624&group_id=61702> If you could take a look at it Mark, that would be great. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Date: 2004-07-10 00:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1079441 I accept your expert view that they are the same. I have upped the logging level to 5 as sugggested and will submit a new bug report with the new log file attached once I have a couple of new "spam" mails ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 21:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 It's pretty certain that they are the same problems - the log files are practically identical (same "expecting one row" then "spam field missing" entries). The symptoms are also identical (scored but not moved). Why do you think that it's not the same? Given the two reports, it's possible that the two problems are related. In any case, the higher level report that Mark requested would probably be the most useful thing to get now (more than that will have to come from him). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Richard Deubert (richarddeubert) Date: 2004-07-09 20:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1079441 If this really is linked to my bug report (987243) - which I question - then it most certainly does affect normal operation. In my case Spambayes is not working at all. It simply doesn't move any mails - mails that score 100%. Perhaps the priority should be reconsidered? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin) Date: 2004-07-09 15:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=552329 Noting duplicate in [ 987243 ] Spam won't filter <https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=987243&group_id=61702> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andy Neil (andyneil) Date: 2004-07-09 06:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1050507 After the program did nothing useful for several weeks, I uninstalled. Won't have time to follow up per your suggestions. I understand how all-volunteer projects work in terms of prioritization/response time, sorry I won't be able to help out. Good luck. AN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Mark Hammond (mhammond) Date: 2004-06-29 13:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14198 That error is is very interesting, but I don't believe it is related to spam not being moved. That error relates to our attempt at determining if the 'Spam' field exists in the folder, but should not affect the normal filtering. You will see this message once each time SpamBayes starts, and each time the config dialog is closed. Your log indicates everything is going normally. Can you please go to the SB manager, Advanced->Diagnostics, and set the log level to "2". Then restart spambayes, and wait for the next spam correctly classified, but not moved. Could you then please create a *new* bug for that specific issue, and attach the log. I want to take over this bug for that error message you see - but as I mentioned, I'm not convinced they are related. I'm lowering the priority on this, as I also don't believe it will affect normal operation. Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=498103&aid=961019&group_id=61702 _______________________________________________ Spambayes-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-bugs
