Tony Meyer wrote: >> When I look in my Junk mail folder those empty spam still have a spam >> probability of below 50%, partly caused by those "message-id:invalid" >> headers (sorry I didn't pick that up sooner). I looked at some >> Exchange mails in my inbox and all those have invalid message-id. So >> just like from:none, all of my internal Exchange mails have >> "message-id:invalid". > > Interesting - I wouldn't have thought they would have any message-id. > Could you pick a random Exchange (good) mail, and send me a copy of > the message id header for that message? Maybe there's an Exchange > format for the things that we can leverage.
I get the same message-id behavior from our Exchange server. Here's the complete set of headers from a recent mail as SpamBayes sees them in Show Clues. """ X-Exchange-Message: true Subject: A recent Exchange message From: Joe Smith To: All Employees X-Exchange-Delivery-Time: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:52:22 -0500 """ This was taken using latest CVS. Names have been changed to protect the innocent, but otherwise the headers are completely intact. Notice that there is no message id header of any sort, and that the From and To fields do not use Internet standard address format. The following tokens were included among the clues, and are typical for most if not all of my Exchange mail: """ token spamprob #ham #spam 'message-id:invalid' 0.214766 19 9 'x-mailer:none' 0.622068 88 258 'from:no real name:2**0' 0.642539 29 93 """ Maybe there's a property in the Outlook message object somewhere that we need to retrieve and add to the headers when we reconstruct the message? -- Kenny Pitt _______________________________________________ spambayes-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-dev
