[Tony Meyer]
>> Modified Files:
>> spambayes.iss
>>
>> + UsagePage := CreateInputOptionPage(UserPage.ID,
>> + 'Personal Information', 'How will you use My Program?',
>> + 'Please specify how you would like to use My Program, then
>> click Next.', + True, False);
>> + UsagePage.Add('Light mode (no ads, limited functionality)');
>> + UsagePage.Add('Sponsored mode (with ads, full functionality)');
>> + UsagePage.Add('Paid mode (no ads, full functionality)');
[Kenny Pitt]
> Dare I even ask what this stuff is all about? <wink>
Opps. As you've guessed, I had decided to try and update spambayes.iss for
Inno 5.x, and accidentally checked that stuff in. I'll revert it soonish.
> BTW, py2exe doesn't put MSVCR71.dll in the dist/bin by
> default so the InnoSetup script won't compile initially. Is
> copying MSVCR71.DLL to py2exe/dist/bin just a manual step
> that needs to be done before running Inno? If so, we may
> want to include that in README-DEVEL.txt.
I'm still trying to get my head around what to do with msvcr71.dll. Thomas
Heller on the py2exe-users list said that he thinks that (in his IANAL
opinion) you need a license to redistribute mscvr71.dll. If that's the
case, then we can't include it with SpamBayes (I'll do a 1.0.4 with Python
2.3, and 1.1a1 can be built with 2.3 as well), AFAICT.
If it is legit to include it, then we need to figure where to source it.
Either it's not distributed with Python or the Python install puts it in
windows\system32 (I haven't had a chance to check). (Thomas's (again,
IANAL) opinion was that it was legit for Python to redistribute the dll.
There was some discussion of this a while back on python-dev, I believe).
If Python does install it, then we can just source it from wherever it gets
put (the setup_all.py script can do this). If Python doesn't install it,
but we are going to, then a manual copy is probably the only option, and
we'll just have to update README-DEVEL.txt.
Using Python 2.4 has turned out to be a right PITA, really, and I wish I had
just stuck with 2.3. It is tempting to give up using 2.4, and just include
email 3.0 instead (IIRC that's a reasonably simple option), since that's the
primary reason for using 2.4.
=Tony.Meyer
_______________________________________________
spambayes-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-dev
