On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:14:53 +1200, Tony Meyer wrote: >> By the way, I've noticed SPAM that used to be classified as SPAM is >> now being DEFER'ed. I find this behaviour odd, since 85% of my >> e-mail is SPAM, and always has been.
>By "DEFER'ed", do you mean that it's classified as unsure? Yes, unsure. >This could be >either new types of spam, or as a result of new training (e.g. a training >mistake, a growing imbalance). My current balance is 66% SPAM, 33% HAM. (Spam: 3082 Ham: 1096) Could this cause the problem? >The way to figure out why a message scores what it does is to look at the >clues for that message (there's a link on the review page). If it's not >obvious why it scored what it did, then you can send a copy on to >[email protected] and someone will comment on it. >It's possible that the problem can be fixed by adjusting your thresholds >(the defaults are fairly conservative). I'll take a gander at the clues and see if it's something stupid that I did. Sincerely, Andrew Burns +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+ | From Concept To Reality, LLC. | | ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | | http://users.nac.net/fctr | +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+ | Voice: (908) 879-3274 | | FAX: (908) 879-3275 | +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+ _______________________________________________ spambayes-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-dev
