[Switching to spambayes-dev to try and catch the attention of the right people]
[Tony] >> I wonder if we ought to switch to defaulting to ZODB for 1.1a2; >> I've been using it for over a year without any database problems [Richie] > +1 provided there aren't multi-process issues - as I understand it, > ZODB > (without ZEO) isn't multi-process safe. Which means it should be > fine for > the POP3 proxy and (I assume?) the Outlook add-in, but maybe not > for the > Unix side of things? Good question. ZODB will fail to open the database if another process already has it open. Do those people using SpamBayes in the *nix world have two SpamBayes processes running at the same time? I presume two reading processes would work fine with bsddb. =Tony.Meyer _______________________________________________ spambayes-dev mailing list spambayes-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-dev
