Looks like I accidentally hit Reply instead of Reply All on this, so I'm forwarding to the list.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Kenny Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Apr 10, 2006 9:35 AM Subject: Re: [spambayes-dev] Switch to Subversion? To: Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 4/7/06, Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Tony Meyer] > > Hey everyone :) > > > > Now that sourceforge offers subversion as well as CVS, what does > > everyone think about switching spambayes over to svn? > > I only care about people actively doing checkins. Is that set larger > than Tony today ;-)? > > SVN is better than CVS in many ways, and migrations usually go > smoothly, so it's a good move in the absence of killer objections. Well, I certainly haven't been active lately <0.5 wink>, but I've been hoping to find time to get back on the bandwagon soon. I've always had good luck in general with SVN as long as it's using http or https instead of the svn protocol. I was able to do an anonymous checkout from SVN with no issues after I accepted the SourceForge SSL cert that was signed by a root authority that wasn't in the default authorities for Win 2003. I've never had any problems with SourceForge CVS, so I'm really a "don't care" from that standpoint, I guess. There are definately some features in SVN that I like, though, particularly the ability to atomically track all of the related file changes that went into a particular update. -- Kenny Pitt -- Kenny Pitt _______________________________________________ spambayes-dev mailing list spambayes-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-dev
