Hi Nigel, > I am prepared to suggest alterations to the Windows FAQ (at least the > parts that affect Eudora),
Thanks! All suggestions for improvements are gratefully received. In the case of the Eudora content, I personally don't use Eudora so I couldn't verify any new content - SpamBayes developers, do any of us use Eudora? > but first I want to have it agreed that I have found an important error. Ah, I'm sorry, but I don't think we can do that: > Essentially spam can only be RECEIVED mail from the POP server (or > IMAP server if you happen to have one). Therefore an SMTP server can > have nothing to do with the question. SpamBayes includes an SMTP proxy that can be used to train SpamBayes. By forwarding email to either a 'ham' address or a 'spam' address, you can train SpamBayes without using the web interface. It's explained in the FAQ, in point 4 of this question: http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#is-there-a-high-level-summary-that-shows-how-spambayes-works > Another point is the preferred file format - as public domain are you > allergic to MS Word 2003? It should be easily convertible to html, > but Word would be much easier for me to format. I think most of us could read it using OpenOffice without triggering any nasty reactions. 8-) > I am also sending this message to the developer's list as it is not > 100% clear which is the right one for this case. I think spambayes-dev@python.org was appropriate - though you might want to send any suggestions to spambayes@python.org so that they can be reviewed by non-developer Eudora/SpamBayes users. -- Richie Hindle [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ spambayes-dev mailing list spambayes-dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-dev
