> I'm currently writing a column in PC Authority magazine > (www.pcauthority.com.au <http://www.pcauthority.com.au/> ) on the new wave > of spam that use randomised or semi-randomised words to confound Bayesian > filters.
I can take this, cos it's in my timezone, if no-one else wants to. I figure the key point about the random word spam is that it's just trying to overwhelm the bayesian filters. Personally, I'm finding them _slightly_ effective (2 or 3 a day slip through if they hit the right words) but not significantly more than that. Fundamentally, they still have to put words in that sell a product, and that screws them over. Anthony _______________________________________________ spambayes-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-dev
