Hi Mark, "Mark Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could help us out here too, by running some of your image spam against > the various engines and manually inspecting the accuracy of the text versus > what you actually see in the image. Sure... I just severely lack time to do that in the forseeable future. :-/ So, my message was just "in case you didn't know" about tesseract yet. > My quick experiments show that tesseract is very close to the results > I get from gocr, and significantly better than ocrad. OK, so you had already tried it. Thanks! -- Florent _______________________________________________ spambayes-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes-dev
