I am using various POP3 clients at home (Outlook Express, Eudora) with Spambayes Proxy installed. All is well regarding to spam filtering.
I'm now in the process of switching to Thunderbird 1.0 and one of its claims to fame is the Bayesian spam filter.
So, from people's experience - how good is TB's filter compared to SB?
As I recall, Thunderbird's spam filter is actually based on SpamBayes. Again, as I recall, there is a difference in the tokenizing that Thunderbird does as compared to SpamBayes. SpamBayes tokenizing is more "complete."
I use Thunderbird. Instead of it's built-in filter, I use SpamBayes. It definitely seems to work better than Thunderbird's built-in filter.
Rick
--
"Income tax returns are the most imaginative fiction being written today." - Herman Wouk
--
"Income tax returns are the most imaginative fiction being written today." - Herman Wouk
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes
Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
