[POPfile / Outclass] > Yeah, it works pretty well too, although as far as I can > tell, it doesn't classify quite as accurately as SpamBayes. > I have it set to sort into Ham, Spam and Unwanted (junk that > isn't really spam) but I keep an eye on the spam folder with > SpamBayes; used on its own, POPfile suffers the occasional > false positive, which I've *never* had with SpamBayes after a > decent amount of training.
Do you have POPfile doing other classification (work, home, etc), or just these three? I haven't ever used POPfile, but I would imagine I would be somewhat more forgiving of mistakes made by software that was trying to do more than just a yes-spam/no-ham(/buggered_if_I_know-unsure) decision. BTW, does POPfile choose just one of the categories, or can you have it select multiple ones? It wouldn't be much use with something like Outlook, but with mailers that work with a 'label' type system, where a message can be in multiple views/folders (gmail/Thunderbird?) that would seem pretty handy. =Tony.Meyer -- Please always include the list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in your replies (reply-all), and please don't send me personal mail about SpamBayes. http://www.massey.ac.nz/~tameyer/writing/reply_all.html explains this. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
