Hi Tony & All, I just had another message move to the Review folder though its Spam score was over 98%. It is the "Viicodin" message below.
Here is the relevant piece of the log, but, unfortunately, I can't make sufficient sense of it. The relevant material starts in line 4 below: The timer with id=23902 was stopped The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping OnItemAdd event for folder <win32com.client.COMEventClass instance at 0x196538000> with item Viicodin for 0nly $178 qZzAh3 New message timer started - id=22721, delay=2000 The timer with id=22721 fired The timer with id=22721 was stopped The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping OnItemAdd event for folder <win32com.client.COMEventClass instance at 0x196538000> with item Patagonia - Winterfest Sale New message timer started - id=22712, delay=2000 The timer with id=22712 fired The timer with id=22712 was stopped The new message timer found no new items, so is stopping Thanks for any help on this, -- Kenneth Sole & Associates, Inc. Box 292 Durham, New Hampshire 03824 Voice: 603-659-3169 Fax: 603-659-2248 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.soleAssociates.com PGP: http://wwwkeys.ch.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE17941C6 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kenneth Sole Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 9:25 AM To: 'Kenneth Sole'; 'Tony Meyer'; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Spambayes] Duplicate messages handled differently...? Hi again, I had been focusing on duplicate messages that were sent by SpamBayes to different folders, but that seems have to been a mistake on my part: I just noticed about a dozen messages that were sent to my Review folder though they all had Spam scores over 90%. But then it gets weirder: I looked in the log for those messages, but they do not appear at all... (I should add that I have my log verbosity set to "0.") Thanks for any further help, -- Kenneth Sole & Associates, Inc. Box 292 Durham, New Hampshire 03824 Voice: 603-659-3169 Fax: 603-659-2248 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.soleAssociates.com PGP: http://wwwkeys.ch.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE17941C6 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kenneth Sole Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 9:06 AM To: 'Kenneth Sole'; 'Tony Meyer'; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Spambayes] Duplicate messages handled differently...? Dear Tony & all, Here are the spam clues for a message that was in my Review folder, and also in my Spam folder: As Tony said earlier, it is "about as Spammy as you can get, but the two identical messages are handled differently by SpamBayes. Below the Clues, I have provided the log. Combined Score: 100% (0.997149) Internal ham score (*H*): 0.00519378 Internal spam score (*S*): 0.999491 # ham trained on: 143 # spam trained on: 725 46 Significant Tokens token spamprob #ham #spam 'inc.' 0.083481 45 20 'bi:please let' 0.151285 4 3 'recent' 0.159347 11 10 'consultant' 0.225851 3 4 'new' 0.247485 68 113 'second' 0.252054 9 15 'thank' 0.272227 45 85 'senior' 0.293227 3 6 'please' 0.297894 88 189 'year,' 0.298036 2 4 'did' 0.305063 19 42 'accurate.' 0.311207 1 2 'bi:content-type:text/plain subject:You' 0.311207 1 2 'bi:that two' 0.311207 1 2 'skip:n 10' 0.316825 15 35 'not' 0.328949 85 211 'business' 0.339118 22 57 'subject:.' 0.340599 23 60 'happy' 0.349989 14 38 'bi:this your' 0.384719 1 3 'have' 0.388424 78 251 'header:Reply-To:1' 0.632261 22 192 'bi:to:2**0 x-mailer:none' 0.647024 40 372 'bi:header:Subject:1 proto:http' 0.662693 33 329 'url:php' 0.772258 7 121 'bi:reach you' 0.844828 0 1 'bi:been notified' 0.908163 0 2 'bi:credit history' 0.908163 0 2 'bi:offer past' 0.908163 0 2 'bi:site ensure' 0.908163 0 2 'factor.' 0.908163 0 2 'inquiry,' 0.908163 0 2 'url:biz' 0.923664 1 64 'advisors' 0.934783 0 3 'bi:our terms' 0.934783 0 3 'bi:records are' 0.934783 0 3 'secure,' 0.934783 0 3 'bi:offering you' 0.949438 0 4 'bi:this special' 0.949438 0 4 'remember,' 0.958716 0 5 'bi:accordance with' 0.965116 0 6 'deal.' 0.965116 0 6 'lenders' 0.965116 0 6 'url:refid' 0.965116 0 6 'bi:are interested' 0.969799 0 7 'bi:your information' 0.983271 0 13 Message Stream Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 15770 invoked by uid 107); 15 Feb 2005 08:16:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 66.132.226.8) (220.83.190.155) by s9006.hostcentric.net with SMTP; 15 Feb 2005 08:16:13 -0000 Received: from 6958042271.mankelmuth.com (0330376192.manjok.com [212.222.208.79]) by 220.83.190.155 Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1041); Tue, 15 Feb 2005 02:14:15 -0600 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "WARD Arianna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Julia " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: You Qualified. Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 02:14:15 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="8043373382" X-Webmail-Time: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 04:06:15 -0400 Alert, This is your Second Notification: Thank you for your recent inquiry, we have been notified that two lenders are interested in offering you a deal. Remember, for this special offer past credit history is not a factor. In accordance with our terms please verify your information on our secure, private site to ensure our records are accurate. http://www.lendx.biz/index2.php?refid=ph420 Happy New Year, --MORALES Senior Business Consultant - Low-Rate Advisors Inc. Did this reach you in error? please let us know...thx http://www.lesdgt.com/r.php All Message Tokens 95 unique tokens '--morales' 'accordance' 'accurate.' 'advisors' 'alert,' 'are' 'been' 'business' 'cc:none' 'consultant' 'content-type:text/plain' 'credit' 'deal.' 'did' 'ensure' 'error?' 'factor.' 'for' 'from:addr:g.flob227' 'from:addr:manitowoc.gannett.com' 'from:name:ward arianna' 'happy' 'have' 'header:Date:1' 'header:From:1' 'header:MIME-Version:1' 'header:Message-ID:1' 'header:Received:3' 'header:Reply-To:1' 'header:Return-Path:1' 'header:Subject:1' 'header:To:1' 'history' 'inc.' 'information' 'inquiry,' 'interested' 'know...thx' 'lenders' 'let' 'low-rate' 'message-id:@manitouinc.com' 'new' 'not' 'notified' 'offer' 'offering' 'our' 'past' 'please' 'private' 'proto:http' 'reach' 'recent' 'records' 'remember,' 'reply-to:addr:lmason_ln' 'reply-to:addr:manitobalife.com' 'reply-to:name:julia ' 'second' 'secure,' 'sender:none' 'senior' 'site' 'skip:n 10' 'special' 'subject: ' 'subject:.' 'subject:Qualified.' 'subject:You' 'terms' 'thank' 'that' 'this' 'to:2**0' 'to:addr:sole' 'to:addr:soleassociates.com' 'to:no real name:2**0' 'two' 'url:biz' 'url:com' 'url:index2' 'url:lendx' 'url:lesdgt' 'url:ph420' 'url:php' 'url:r' 'url:refid' 'url:www' 'verify' 'with' 'x-mailer:none' 'year,' 'you' 'your' Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Kenneth Sole\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Kenneth Sole\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 724 spam and 143 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0.2 (January 2005) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Desktop/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Desktop/Junk SPAM' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... Message 'RE: Starter...?' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Updates on our site (eaten)' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure' Moving and spam training message 'Updates on our site (eaten)' - Training on message 'Updates on our site (eaten)' in 'Desktop/Junk REVIEW - trained as spam Message 'Vecodin, Viiagra are Cheeap OkT' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Vecodin, Viiagra are Cheeap OkT' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Re [23]' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message '100% Automated System! can earn you 6 Figure Income Online!' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Claim your Gift Card!' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'secret source for deep discount viag-ra' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Claim your Gift Card!' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'FREE Smiley Faces for your email' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure' Message 'Don't condoms suck?' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'eBay Favorite Search: gibson banjo' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'eBay Favorite Search: toyota sienna 2004' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'eBay Favorite Search: tommy bahama shirt silk large' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'eBay Favorite Search: yamaha silent guitar' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'eBay Favorite Search: wheatstone concertina' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'eBay Favorite Search: "Nat Nast" shirt silk large -e' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'eBay Favorite Search: vega banjo' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'eBay Favorite Search: Tommy Bahama silk long -xl -xx' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'eBay Favorite Search: wordperfect office suite' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'No' Message 'Viiagra and Xa'naax are Cheeap kS4xHi' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Miss you already' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure' Message 'DESCUENTE SUS CHEQUES' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'viste lo que paso?' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'ADV: your private secret' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Increase the volume of your ejaculation.' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'do you hate traffic cameras?-quizzes butt ' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Interested' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Have a document to print but you are low on ink?' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Tadalafil Soft Tabs - Great results!' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Harder means happier! tips and tricks inside' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Become happy with your performance' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'You Qualified.' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'You Qualified.' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Super Bases 14 CDs $ 80.-' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'First-Rate Rx' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Vecodiin, Viiagra are Cheeap meA0' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'Vecodiin, Viiagra are Cheeap meA0' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' Message 'You Qualified.' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Yes' It would appear from the log that the message ("You Qualified") came in twice, and was classified as Spam both times. Yes, as on occasion before, one is moved the the Spam Folder, and one is moved to the "Review" folder. What might be appropriate next steps to figure this out? Very sincere thanks, -- Kenneth Sole & Associates, Inc. Box 292 Durham, New Hampshire 03824 Voice: 603-659-3169 Fax: 603-659-2248 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.soleAssociates.com PGP: http://wwwkeys.ch.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE17941C6 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kenneth Sole Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 9:45 AM To: 'Kenneth Sole'; 'Tony Meyer'; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Spambayes] Duplicate messages handled differently...? Hello again, I just saw that my log is written each time I run a send/receive cycle. As a result, the log that I sent might not be relevant to my issue. Thanks, -- Kenneth Sole & Associates, Inc. Box 292 Durham, New Hampshire 03824 Voice: 603-659-3169 Fax: 603-659-2248 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.soleAssociates.com PGP: http://wwwkeys.ch.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE17941C6 -----Original Message----- From: Kenneth Sole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 9:40 AM To: 'Tony Meyer'; 'Kenneth Sole'; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Spambayes] Duplicate messages handled differently...? Hi Tony & All, I just received another duplicate message. As happens occasionally, one went to the Spam Folder, and the other to my Review Folder. Here is the Log: Loaded bayes database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Kenneth Sole\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_bayes_database.db' Loaded message database from 'C:\Documents and Settings\Kenneth Sole\Application Data\SpamBayes\default_message_database.db' Bayes database initialized with 652 spam and 134 good messages SpamBayes Outlook Addin Binary Version 1.0.2 (January 2005) starting (with engine SpamBayes Engine Version 0.3 (January 2004)) on Windows 5.0.2195 (Service Pack 4) using Python 2.4 (#60, Nov 30 2004, 11:49:19) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] SpamBayes: Watching (for filtering) in 'Desktop/Inbox' SpamBayes: Watching (for incremental training) in 'Desktop/Junk SPAM' Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer FAILED to add the toolbar item 'SpamBayesCommand.Manager' - (-2147352567, 'Exception occurred.', (0, None, None, None, 0, -2147467259), None) The above toolbar message is common - recreating the toolbar... Message 'cleanse bijective ' in 'Desktop/Inbox' had a Spam classification of 'Unsure' Is the line: "Processing missed spam in folder 'Inbox' by starting a timer" the indication of my problem? I should add that the log above is the one visible when I first noticed the double message. I get mail frequently and wonder if the log I have above might be from a run after the message was received. How might I know that? Thanks for any further help, -- Kenneth Sole & Associates, Inc. Box 292 Durham, New Hampshire 03824 Voice: 603-659-3169 Fax: 603-659-2248 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.soleAssociates.com PGP: http://wwwkeys.ch.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE17941C6 -----Original Message----- From: Tony Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 5:58 PM To: 'Kenneth Sole'; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Spambayes] Duplicate messages handled differently...? > Well, it did not take long to have the opportunity to check the > "clues." I just received two messages (an eBay phishing spam). One > moved to my review folder, the other to my spam folder. The messages > appeared identical, and so as per your suggestion, I checked the > "clues." > > To my surprise, they appear identical as well... And they both scored 100%, which as spammy as you can get. This means that it's not a problem with correctly scoring the message, but with moving the message to the spam folder. Next time this happens could you grab a copy of your log file (SpamBayes->SpamBayes Manager->Advanced->Diagnostics->View Log) and send us a copy of that? Either there will be an error or there should be clues in the messages that are there that will let us figure out what's happening. =Tony.Meyer -- Please always include the list ([email protected]) in your replies (reply-all), and please don't send me personal mail about SpamBayes. http://www.massey.ac.nz/~tameyer/writing/reply_all.html explains this. _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
