> Outlook was doing a good job of filtering, but SpamBayes > wasn't catching hardly any of the spam. Even when they were > nearly identical to previously trained spam. [...] > If you need to see any other files, let me know and I'll add them.
It is impossible to tell why a message scored what it did without seeing the clues report for that message. Next time a message is incorrectly classified (*before* training) please select the message and choose "Show spam clues for this message" from the SpamBayes menu. Send that message on to the list, and we should be able to figure out what is going wrong. =Tony.Meyer -- Please always include the list ([email protected]) in your replies (reply-all), and please don't send me personal mail about SpamBayes. http://www.massey.ac.nz/~tameyer/writing/reply_all.html explains this. _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
