-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Keith Barrows [StarPilot] wrote: > Not that I see so far. It appears to use a junk filter though. Maybe it is > Bayesian based but I don't know for sure... > ________________________________ > Keith Barrows > ASPInsider: http://www.aspinsiders.com/ > Weblogs: http://sol3.net/blogs/starpilot/ | http://sol3.net/blogs/keithb/ > > Help: http://www.asp.net/forums/ | http://devadvice.com/ > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Marc Erickson > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 5:25 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Spambayes] Spambayes for Thunderbird > > Doesn't Thunderbird already have Bayesian spam control?
Thunderbird's junk filter is indeed Bayesian. As a matter of fact, the chief Thunderbird developer, Scott MacGregor once posted the following on the forums at Mozillazine.org: "We model / emulate ourselves after spambayes. We both use the same core algorithm. They have a lot more tokenizer rules than we do." Rick - -- "My wife's jealousy is getting ridiculous. The other day she looked at my calendar and wanted to know who May was." - Rodney Dangerfield -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCZpcRqBIwUybif4YRAkapAJ0fi/cGqhKKNcHXjevpxlVd5LXyjgCfUZ3B 1T9WKW7Qs6DgDPwPQSdjr/Q= =25KT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
