> Have you ever thought about using such an LSP to avoid almost > 90% of the complaints that Spambayes is not working (and > avoiding irritated messages of users who do not understand > your very helpful answers ;-) )?
There's an open feature request for this: [ 970859 ] Transparent proxying support? <http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=970859&group_id=61 702&atid=498106> It's certainly possible (with Windows and some *nixes, at least), but it does make things vastly more complicated (under the hood; theoretically it's less complicated for users). I agree that it would be great to have the install process for sb_server much simpler, and that this is where most people have problems. However, IMO, finishing the "autoconfigure" script, which does all the configuration stuff for the user (for various common mail clients) would be a cleaner and nicer way of doing this. Since it's almost done, it would require much less time, too (which means it's more likely to be done). OTOH, the SpamExperts guys have indicated that they intend to contribute back code to SpamBayes, so maybe a LSP-enabled SpamBayes may turn up in the future. Thanks for the suggestion! =Tony.Meyer -- Please always include the list (spambayes at python.org) in your replies (reply-all), and please don't send me personal mail about SpamBayes. http://www.massey.ac.nz/~tameyer/writing/reply_all.html explains this. _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
