Tony Meyer wrote: >>I went ahead and used the pickle option. I have the feeling >>that it would keep on happening. The version I am using is >>1.1a1 (April 2005). >> >> > >1.1a1 has a major problem with sb_server and will continually corrupt the >messageinfo database. You'll probably find that the pickle doesn't get >corrupted, but is really slow. When we find time to release 1.1a2, this >will be fixed - for now, I highly recommend only using sb_server with 1.0.4 >or source from CVS. > >=Tony.Meyer > >
I am too stupid to read your signature line, and was not replying to all, plus it was early in the morning and I am not much of a morning person. I am not sure what you mean by slow when using the pickle. It seems to work okay enough on my end, and it is faster than sorting through about 20 pieces of spam to find one valid email from a family member or a friend. I think I'll stick with the 1.1a1 version for now since I am already using the pickle, and it just works which is important right now. I am glad looking at the above paragraph that you didn't decide to call it a cucumber. Tim _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
