That's probably it. My recollection is hazy at best; this may indicate that I failed to pay sufficiently close attention as I read, which likely also led to misunderstanding the message.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 4:02 PM > To: Jesse Pelton > Cc: Tim Peters; [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Spambayes] Backup daqtabase > > > Jesse> I'm pretty sure I've seen discussion on the list > of a training > Jesse> regimen that involved discarding aged messages... > > I use a so-called "train to exhaustion" regime (*). One part > of my current > implementation is to always process messages from newest to > oldest. That > way older messages carry less weight (they will more likely be scored > correctly because newer messages have already contributed > their contents to > the training database). Is that what you were thinking of? > > Skip > > (*) http://www.garyrobinson.net/2004/02/spam_filtering_.html > > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/spambayes/spambayes/cont > rib/tte.py?rev=1.16&view=markup > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
