On 10/29/05, Tony Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Michael] > > >> The problem I have with this configuration is, that overtraining > >> and wrong > >> classification happen too easily. [...] perhaps you should change > >> the > >> default configuration of SpamBayes accordingly? > > [Richie] > > +1 > > +1 from me, too. I've wondered about doing this in the past, but > haven't got around to it (it is simple enough for users to change the > default themselves, but it would be nice if they didn't have to).
Another +1 here. For anyone whose received mail is not balanced between ham and spam, train-on-everything will quickly drive their training to an imbalanced state as well, so it should probably be discouraged for any inexperienced users (i.e. those who generally stick to defaults). -- Kenny Pitt _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
