If the bad guys weren't changing tactics all the time stable code would be fine. I am getting more and more spam that is not being identified even on the third and fourth sample. I have not done a rigorous investigation but I'm assuming they are fiddling with stuff I can't see unless I look at the raw source.
_____________________________________________________________________ Darryl Baker Senior Unix Specialist gedas USA, Inc. Operational Services Business Unit 3800 Hamlin Road Auburn Hills, MI 48326 US phone +1-248-754-5341 fax +1-248-754-6399 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gedasusa.com _____________________________________________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 10:32 AM To: Baker, Darryl Cc: spambayes@python.org Subject: Re: [Spambayes] Is SpamBayes still alive? Darryl> Is this software still being worked on or did the project die? Stable code isn't necessarily a bad thing. Not much, if anything, new is going on in the development area. Tony Meyer keeps threatening a new release, but that will not likely have significant algorithmic changes. Lots of people and organizations use it. Skip _______________________________________________ SpamBayes@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
